lunes, 28 de noviembre de 2011

más acuarelas









acuarelas varias









FNA 2005





obras de la muestra FNA





bio de Pablo


Datos biográficos - Pablo Menicucci


Pablo Menicucci nació en Mar del Plata  en 1933.
De 1960 a 1966 estudia Artes Visuales recibiéndose de Profesor Nacional en la Escuela Martín Malharro de Mar del Plata.
En 1967 gana una beca a París otorgada por la Embajada de Francia.
Entre 1961 y 1987 realizó quince viajes al exterior estudiando y trabajando en Bélgica, Brasil, Estados Unidos, Grecia, Dinamarca, España, Francia, Holanda, Inglaterra, Italia, Portugal y Suiza.

Exposiciones individuales


1967/72 Galería Lirolay, Buenos Aires
1967/69/74/76/77/78/79/80/81 Galería del Mar, Mar del Plata
1969/71 Galería Arte Nuevo, Buenos Aires
1973 Galería Rubbers, BuenosAires
1974/75/77/80 Galería Bonino, Buenos Aires
1977 Centro Cultural Argentino, París
1983/84 Galería Centoria, Buenos Aires
1984 Retrospectiva Museo Castagnino, Mar del Plata
1988 Galería Vemeer, Buenos Aires
1994 Galería De Santi, Buenos Aires
1998 Menicucci, 30 años, Museo Castagnino, Mar del Plata
1999 Centro Cultural Auditórium, Mar del Plata
1999 Centro Cultural Borges, Buenos Aires
2005 Menicucci. Pop glamoroso, Fondo Nacional de las Artes, Buenos Aires
2007 Menicucci. Centro Cultural Borges, Buenos Aires



Exposiciones colectivas


1967 Ver y Estimar, Museo de Arte Moderno, Buenos Aires
            Premio Georges Braque, Museo de Arte Moderno, Buenos Aires
            Arte de Avanzada en la Argentina, Roland Lambert Gallery
1968 Grands et Jenues d´aujurd´hui´,
Museo de Arte Moderno, París
Exposition des artistes boursiers du gouvernement francais, Centre Universitaire, París
1969 Experiencias´69, Instituto Torcuato Di Tella, Buenos Aires
1972 Rassegna San Fedele, Centro Cultural Milano
1973 Pequeño formato, Muestra Itinerante por América Latina
1974 Pintura argentina, Galería Rubbers, Buenos Aires
1979 Homenaje a Julio Verne, Museo de Arte Moderno, Buenos Aires
            Premio Encotel, Palacio de Correos, Buenos Aires
1980 Premio internacional de dibujo,
Centro Juan Miró, Barcelona
Museo de Arte Contemporáneo, Madrid
            Retrospectiva de artistas ganadores del Premio Braque,
Museo de Arte Moderno, Buenos Aires
1981 Bienal del dibujo, Museo Castagnino, Mar del Plata
1982 Certamen Pintura, Fundación Gutemberg, Buenos Aires
1983 Jornadas de la crítica, Galería Arte Nuevo, Buenos Aires
            Artistas tiempo libre, Centro Cultural Recoleta, Buenos Aires
            Homenaje a la democracia (surrealismo),
Galería Centoia, Buenos Aires
            Premio Benson & Hedges de murales,
Centro Cultural Recoleta, Buenos Aires
1984 El juguete, Museo Castagnino, Mar del Plata
            Artistas generación intermedia,
Museo Castagnino, Mar del Plata
            Artistas en papel, Centro Cultural Recoleta, Buenos Aires
            Libro de artistas, Centro Cultural Recoleta, Buenos Aires
1989 Semana de la crítica internacional,
Galería Van Riel, Buenos Aires
1992 Los juegos de los artistas, Museo Castagnino, Mar del Plata
1993 Homenaje a Piazzolla, Galería de Santi, Buenos Aires
1994 Ver y Estimar (antes del Di Tella),
Museo Nacional de Bellas Artes, Buenos Aires
2001 Bocas
Centro Cultural Borges. Buenos Aires
2004 Objeto y representación
Museo Juan C. Castagnino, Mar del Plata
2005 Arte Forum
Villa Victoria Ocampo. Mar del Plata


Premios Obtenidos


1967 Premio Georges Braque, beca a París por un año
1972 Premio Martín Malharro del Salón Manuel Belgrano,
Museo Sívori
1972 Suplente Beca a Italia, Fondo Nacional de las Artes
1972 Primer Premio Salón Municipal, Mar del Plata
1973 Primer premio en orden provincial y segundo en orden nacional Artistas visuales del interior,
Museo de Arte Moderno, Buenos Aires
1976 Finalista Premio J. Payró
1979 Primer premio concurso Encotel, Año internacional del Niño y la Familia
Emisión del sello postal con la obra premiada
1981 Primer premio Salón Provincial, Buenos Aires
1982 Primer premio Bienal de Dibujo, Mar del Plata
1983 Mención concurso de murales Benson & Hedges
1983 Primer premio Pintura, Centro Gallego Mar del Plata
(Jurados: Jorge Glusberg y Wolf Vostell)
1983 Primer premio Bienal Museo Castagnino, Mar del Plata

Se encuentran obras suyas en museos e importantes colecciones privadas de Argentina, Brasil, Venezuela, Estados Unidos, Austria, Francia, Holanda, Italia e Inglaterra.




textos de Pablo Menicucci III


Menicucci

Glamorous pop


Pablo Menicucci was born in Mar del Plata, a coastal city with pop features  typical of the world of publicity, showbiz, the star system and the idleness associated with summer resorts. Even though he always painted and drew with passion, Menicucci never followed a regular course. His first teacher was the master painter Juan Carlos Castagnino. Menicucci’s father was the manager of a hostel in nearby Mar Chiquita. Aware of his son’s passion for drawing, he asked Castagnino to take his son in as a student. It was from Castagnino that Menicucci would learn everything  about art production, and set out to put it into practice. He would wake up in the morning to make pencil drawings, in silence. Then he would have lunch and take a rest almost without speaking, until the time came to resume his work. In the afternoon he turned to color and ink. His love for manual work dates back to those days.

Menicucci then went on to study with Policastro, a meticulous color artist with a rich palette and a most refined taste. Policastro made him love and discover landscape in all its variables. With every brushstroke on the canvas, he would recover different shades of color from a poetic vision of the surroundings. This knowledge allowed him to catch the predominant color of the city where he used to live and to use those shades of color to build an image in which the landscape itself had never been present.

Finally, in the 1960s the School of Visual Arts was opened at the Mar del Plata Club Building. It was razed by fire the following year. From those days, Menicucci recalls his close relationship with friends and colleagues with whom he dared to break certain aesthetic barriers.

In 1964 he traveled to Europe for the first time. At Venice´s Biennial he stumbled upon a stand that was far from ordinary; mostly, it dealt with informalism. Menicucci was completely overwhelmed by the vitality of this form of pop art. It was the pop aesthetics of the US stand: Rauschemberg, Jasper Johns, Claes Oldenburg and Jim Dine. These two confronted positions inspired him to become an artist. He was taken over by the freedom expressed by those simple paintings which had nothing to conceal. It was painting and it was figurative art, full of minute details that captured the sign of the times like no other medium did.

II

By 1967 Menicucci was already a mature artist.  The previous year, he graduated with flying colors from the School of Visual Arts.  Together with friends from Mar del Plata, he was invited to exhibit at Galería Lirolay in Buenos Aires.

Menicucci was the first artist to exhibit at Galería del Mar, a legendary avant garde  venue in Mar del Plata. This is where he put together the first art “happening” in that city. Fruits, toys, vegetables and  buckets of paint were on display for viewers to eat or consume otherwise. All the while, some of his friends, standing on a bridge, listened to music in a relaxed atmosphere. But visitors chose to use the space in quite an unexpected way, playing with food and paint. The gallery became a party of confusing runs. Two high-ranking members of the Navy Base who happened to be there were splashed over with orange-colored tempera. As a result, the artists were taken to the police station for questioning. Luckily for them, this was before the bloody military dictatorship of 1976-83, known as the “Proceso.” the artists were just asked, “What were you guys trying to do?”. The incident made headlines in the local newspapers, and the artists felt they had to  apologize publicly.

The art critic Jorge Romero Brest was on summer holidays in Mar del Plata. He invited Menicucci and his friends to visit him at his beach tent at the Yatching Club. They were all asked to define some key concepts of art.

Romero Brest then invited them to the prestigious Ver y Estimar prize at the Foundation he headed at the time. Menicucci submitted a beautiful work which contained the idea of object - a three-dimension glass case. His work made an impact but received no distinction. The same year, he decided to enter the Braque Prize. His entry, entitled ¡Hola Sophia!, was a tribute to his favorite diva, Sophia Loren. It was his mother who had taught him to love Loren, with whom she identified  because they were both southern Italian girls.  In a rented apartment he shared with his friends, Menicucci finished the parallelepipe, the eyes, the mouth, and the daises in a fortnight. The work, which later would go on to be hailed as a masterpiece, was carefully wrapped. Together with Mercedes Esteves, Menicucci boarded a  train to Buenos Aires, where they set up the work at a corner of the third floor of the Centro Cultural San Martín, at the time the only see of the Modern Art Museum. The work made an impact, earning Menicucci the prize for under 35s. At age 33 - “already old,“- as he used to say - he traveled to Paris, where he would live for more than a year. The students’ uprisings of May 68 caught him by surprise but provided him with a unique opportunity to appreciate the value of ideology and the commitment demonstrated by the young protesters.

III

Menicucci’s work with volume strengthened his artistry and craftmanship. But these pieces, like the ones by Wessselman or Dine in those days, consisted  of a wood frame and a cardboard canvas, a sophisticated surface which called for frontal depiction. Divas were one of the main topics of pop art in those days. Portrayed in the same pose they appeared in magazines, these divas came to epitomize glamour and, in many cases, tragedy.. Menicucci`s Sophia was a diva who had overcome the tragic fate of North American women. For she was a refined Latin woman  who had left behind her origins as a poor girl from southern Italy. Her smile and her demeanor, which only an Italian woman could have achieved, became the stereotype of glamorous sensuality, mostly through her voluptuous mouth. With red lipstick on, Loren’s mouth possessed a classical beauty in Menicucci’s drawing, as a cult object, a fetish. Menicucci would always paint Loren’s mouth as an eternal homage to the screen diva. Menicucci’s use of a real object and ready made techniques modified yet respected the boundaries between camp and fetish.

Menicucci recovered the mannequins discarded by Los Gallegos department store  and transformed them into mariner ladies, retro ladies, and musical comedy girls, beautiful and charming yet distant.

Furniture pieces, bottles and trinkets were also used with diaphanous hues. “My wish is to create a work that keeps the fluency of a conversation or a game. It is through them that I position  myself on the antipodes of synthesis, because what I try to say is that ,luckily, life is generous, rich and varied”, Menicucci was quoted as saying at  that time.

Like other artists, Menicucci too fell under the spell of souvenirs and two pesos trinkets bought at dime stores. He collected countless small boxes of souvenirs from in different trips. Some were small sculptures made of good quality plastic; some others were small animals from Africa, or dolls and little ladies dressed in romantic gowns, full of small pleats and ribbons. These were objects collected by a flaneur  who traveled the world observing everything with delight, stopping to acknowledge the effort embodied by those representations. Indeed, Menicucci will go on at large about them,. Explaining that each one comes from a different place. he will bring back geographical memories, will show childish surprise because he refuses to acknowledge these are mass production items. He chooses, instead, to
 regard them as unique pieces.

IV

I have heard Menicucci speak about a type of sexuality that reflects our time. It is an androgenic sensuality, deprived and disturbing, with a faded splendor. His retro divas rest in pastel colors, their eyes hardly visible, almost without eyebrows, their heads wrapped in capelins and hats. Their eyes staring ahead, or lost in the distance, alone or accompanied, these elegant ladies are ubiquitous in Menicucci’s work.They are survivors of an eternal type of woman, distinguished, with harmonious slenderness, distant, like memories of  times gone by. In a way, they make a sharp contrast with Menicucci’s caritas, a series in which the artists leaves ladies aside as the object of portraiture..

They are made of cutout frames, or painted on canvas on slightly textured backgrounds, vibrating with color. There is an adolescent air to the sittees. They are full of determination and, intelligent; their mouths are delicate, well drawn, describing their dispassionate, cold attitude.

The stroke of the paint brush leaves slightly recognizable marks on a surface, and also a delicate touch of subtle hues. Although the canvas has a fine coating of paint, it is always loaded with enough paint brush strokes to give that color to the surface. Before, the surface was plane, but now Menicucci feels that he cannot see the cutout on the plane surface. This type of work, Menicucci muses, was done in a different context, with a different kind of energy. The images, for all their power,  maintain the tendency to glamour and showbiz glitter that so characterizes magazine portraiture. The subjects, however, are no longer recognizable: they are anonymous, as the artists have ceased to pay tribute to their screen idols. Their fetish objects, these days, are a whole lot of objects exhibited in small glass cases, and tell no story.at all.

In this new collection of more recent masterpieces, Menicucci uses the resources already evident in the early phase of his career. These resources are now used with the awareness he acquired after so many years. Being witness to so much decadence - mostly in the last years - in Mar del Plata was no easy thing for Menicucci. Gone is the glamorous splendor of yore. Opportunities are more scarce for everyone, even for experienced artists. But Menicucci’s loyalty to pop art remains intact. Castagnino was the bridge to contemporary aesthetics in Mar del Plata, embracing abstraction in his last phase. He was a witness to his time, and transformed the epic nature of our identity into a stereotype. Pablo Menicucci could well be the one man from Mar del Plata to inaugurate a contemporary art phase, circling inside and outside the city. Menicucci, indeed, does not shun the use of space, the appropriation of objects, the performance techniques. Even today, some of his innovative proposals of the 60s and 70s are hardly known in Mar del Plata.

Our relationship started some years ago, when I began to write and Menicucci told me his stories punctuated by emphatical gestures.This is why I wanted to help him recover the visibility of his legendary work, lost in an incident during the last military dictatorship.

Delegation isn’t something Menicucci will readily go for. Instead, he always chooses to update a new version of his own self. This fact moved me as much as his new vision of Sophia Loren. Now, she is a beautiful, mature woman who no longer smiles with her eyes.
  

textos Pablo Menicucci II


Menicucci 30 años
Una mirada cándida
Si algo resalta en esta retrospectiva es una especie de inocencia, de candor por cosas que emocionan desde su simplicidad. Una mirada de niño que puede percibir todos los detalles de algo que lo conmueve. Sin embargo se trata más bien de un testigo de una inocencia perdida en los años 40 - recuérdese que una de las estrellas arquetípicas del cine de esa época era “la ingenua”, la mujer capaz de mostrar las medias que cubren sus torneadas piernas sin erotismo, con una sensualidad primitiva, gráfica-.
Testigo privilegiado que miró el Mayo Francés sin entender demasiado, ajeno en su idilio por la Europa que conoció en tantos viajes, a la protesta, la rebelión, las ideologías.
Su obra no contiene elementos contestatarios, invita a creer en corazones simples, llenos de amor.
Nadie puede dudar que Menicucci introduce en Mar del Plata los elementos del Pop y que es en los finales de los 60 un personaje clave, capaz de conquistar a los teóricos como Romero Brest por su imagen, capaz de saltar hacia Buenos Aires con la fuerza de su candor con su obra embalada en un tren para ganar el Premio Bracque. Capaz de movilizar con un happening una ciudad provinciana.

El Pop no es un invento norteamericano propiamente dicho. Nace incipiente en Inglaterra en 1954 con una exposición titulada “Esto es Mañana” donde un artista como Richard Hamilton presenta un collage en el cual un hombre musculoso en una típica pose de fisicoculturista, sostiene un chupetín gigante con la palabra POP en grandes letras. El propio Hamilton enuncia en 1957 que las cualidades que estaba buscando en su pintura eran: “popularidad, transitoriedad, desechabilidad, ingenio, sensualidad, artimañas y atractivos”.
Evoluciona en Londres a través de jóvenes estudiantes de las escuelas de arte e introduce el uso del assemblage – al decir de Lucie Smith: yuxtaposiciones de objetos preexistentes, donde la contribución del artista habría de encontrarse más en establecer conexiones entre objetos, que en hacer nuevos objetos-. El assemblage permite también la incorporación al medio ambiente, por medio de formatos diversos de la planimetría de la pintura tradicional; y al happening, categoría del arte que implica la participación en actos del espectador-.
El punto clave para comprenderlo es la cultura urbana de Londres y Norteamérica en los años de posguerra. El comic, los disturbios raciales y la silla eléctrica, las repeticiones de mitos del cine, la cultura publicitaria de los anuncios, las insidiosas repeticiones del horror de la televisión en plena expansión en Nueva York. También la figura del artista, cuya personalidad trasciende incluso a su obra, sino es tal vez “la obra” propiamente dicha.

En la recorrida de las salas de esta muestra, notamos que faltan algunos elementos de su obra que hubieran sido bienvenidos. Algunos de sus paralelepípedos de las primeras épocas, o de sus maniquíes comprados en Los Gallegos y transformados con maquillaje a su estilo, pestañas postizas pintadas incluidas. Obras que según Pablo se han perdido por allí, o están en colecciones particulares.
Se reconocen, sin embargo, tres tendencias básicas. 
Una genuinamente Pop, que implica sus primeras obras, donde construye con volumen, utilizando los mitos del cine. Pinturas que tratan las variaciones de la forma con tintas planas, de contornos nítidos. Tendencia que evoluciona hacia las imágenes casi gráficas, llenas de candor de las revistas de labores francesas o de cantantes populares- maravillosos ejemplos entre los que se cuentan “El cantor desconocido”, “Modes et Travaux” y “Gomina”-. Allí aparecen los elementos lineales que con segmentos en escala con su correspondiente sombra producen un ritmo, descolocan el sentido de planimetría del fondo dándole aire y liviandad a los tonos apagados.
Otra, de una geometría sensible, pulcra, perfeccionista. Sutil en la utilización del color.
Y finalmente, una surrealista, pero con caracterizado sentido metafísico. La inmanencia de los volúmenes geométricos, de las acuarelas como “La luna” que se encuentran en la planta baja.
La serie de los gatos se inscribe en las dos primeras líneas, pues combina un detalle perfeccionista, regodeo de técnica sensualista en la captación de cada uno de los pormenores del brillo de la mirada o las variaciones del pelo. Serie que evoluciona hacia un acompañamiento de los gatos con otros elementos descontextualizados, como cartas, sobres, vistas de ciudades.
La confluencia también se expresa en obras en las que aparecen homenajes a Bracque, aires a Modigliani –ojos sin órbita, cuellos alargados, como en “Melancólico poema provinciano”-. Las formas se encuentran integradas por la simplicidad de estar cerca, por el color, por el sólo interés por el que fueron agrupadas.
Hay una obra que se evade, tendencia sin continuidad que contiene elementos gestuales en aparente desorden que es “Sofia”, donde el color tiene una fuerza expresiva potente, donde hay superposiciones y contrastes como no se ven con frecuencia en su obra.
Merecida retrospectiva, que permite evaluar el contenido de una evolución que esperamos no se detenga.

Pilar Altilio